Thursday, July 23, 2009

Digesting the 2009 Routes & Mapping Survey

This past January we took a survey specifically aimed at Adventure Cycling route map users. The aim was to find out how our maps are being used, how we might improve them, and where technology fits into the picture. We received loads of feedback, nearly 60,000 words worth! After reading some suggestions, we looked at each other and said, "of course!" while others left us scratching our heads, "hmm, how would we do that?"

In between our regularly scheduled mapmaking tasks, we are still sorting out the finer details of the returns, separating compliments (thank you!) from criticisms or suggestions, and planning the implementation of a thing or two. You'll have to wait for the launch of the new Sierra Cascades Route to discover the tweaks we've made. (a couple of tweaks are also showing up on the maps newly converted to GIS, i.e. Grand Canyon Connector and Great Parks South, section 1.)

One piece of information we discovered is that the majority of our users (38%) navigate by reading the map panel rather than the written narratives. I know I have a great appreciation for both, and flip back and forth. Sometimes it just isn't possible to show everything that's happening on the map and written narratives are the only way to go. How about you? What's your preference?

--

GEOPOINTS BULLETIN is written by Jennifer 'Jenn' Milyko, an Adventure Cycling cartographer, and appears weekly, highlighting curious facts, figures, and persons from the Adventure Cycling Route Network, with tips and hints for personal route creation thrown in for good measure.

0 comments:

Post a Comment

We appreciate your comments! We encourage lively discussion and dissent. Constructive criticism is welcome. However, if your comment flames the author or topic, or is considered spam, it will be deleted.